It was a just another day for the 7 lakh Kashmiri Pundits, none of them had expected that this day would mark the beginning of their end. Regarded as true patriots and loyal sons of India for over the past 500 years, with almost 100% literacy, each and every Kashmiri pundit took an immense pride in his belongingness to the great clan.
On Jan 19 1990, the final call given by the recent "Saviour of Democracy" , "Only ray of hope for Pakistan" late Mrs. Benazir Bhutto, with echoings in each and every mosque of Kashmir, started an apocalypse for a peaceful faction of the local inhabitants.
Slogans of "Freedom" , "Independent Kashmir" rang through the streets and with it started a phase of every possible inhumane atrocities, being inflicted upon helpless pundits, surpassing the boundaries of human imagination.Men young and Old alike were picked up, brutally murdered. Their mutilated dead bodies were either thrown on the streets or in the rivers. Women were raped and hung naked from trees. Petrified the pundits had to flee their own homeland and take "Refuge" in other parts of the so called secular country.
Isnt it shameful that our own citizens had to take a refuge in their own country. The kashmiris were staunch supporters of an India ruled Kashmir , now that they have been driven away Pakistan as well as secessionist forces demand a plebiscite in Kashmir, what s the meaning of such a poll when half of the inhabitants ( all of whom held the view of Kashmir being an integral part of India) have been driven away.
It has been 18 years now, those still alive are languishing in the refugee camps, with the faint hope that they would rehabilitated somewhere someday.
About 20,000 pundits have died in camps owing to lack of basic medicare, non availability of drinking water, absence of sanitation. Their population has dwindled drastically. Leave apart justice they don't even have the access to bare minimum sustainable resources. Successive governments promised to deliver the pundits of their misery but have failed to do so thanks to the dominion status of Kashmir that they do not form a vote bank, neither do they have a representative MP which has to be wooed. The chances of existence of the pundits appear bleak unless some concrete measures are taken. The issue has always been sidelined, thanks to the media and our politicians unfortunately without whose support such errors of the past can not be corrected.
Thursday, March 20, 2008
Wednesday, March 19, 2008
Scarlette Keeling Murder
The misery and anguish of Fiona Mackeown must have been increased manifold thanks to the uncongenial attitude of the Goa government. The hostile actions of Mr. Ram Naik have once again put the fairness of our judicial system in doubt. Aggrieved by the death of her teenage daughter does she deserve the treatment that she is being subjected to. Mr. Ram Naik has suggested an inquiry into her sources of income, character and background . Isn't it shameful that instead of apologizing about the wrong conclusions of the first autopsy report, appreciating her courageous efforts and rendering full support to her to bring the assaulter of her daughter to books, the govt is busy trying to sideline the matters by bringing irrelevant thing into the picture. What her income sources are , why she visits Bangalore so frequently, does it any how matter, does it in any way legitimize the baneful act committed at india's tourist capital. All these actions of the Goa authorities (including the first incorrect autopsy report point ) to an attempt to somehow wrap up the case.
Todays Media
The article "The meaning of news and getting it right" rightly points out that "Freedom of the press" has become a euphemism for "Privacy intrusion". There is a subtle line that should not be crossed by the media. Every now and then we come across realities that are presented in a distorted fashion to gain readership. The media today is forgetting what is called "intellectual responsibility" , It has acquired an illegitimate suo moto authority to pass judgment over issues. It has forgotten that it is supposed to separate "news from views". There have been numerous incidences when media has not even apologized for its wrong stand, the recent one being Ishrat Jahan. Contemporary media has to play a pivotal role in maintaining a just and transparent world, which is not possible until media realizes its responsibilities and starts acting in a more value laden manner.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Hockey and Cricket
We often tend to blame our government for not allocating funds for hockey and it is indeed true as just a petty sum of Rs 3 Crore is allocated to the awards and grants to all other sports combined when a single cricketer earns it in period of less than a year. The discrimination is there but its not baseless, its an outcome of the inclinations of people. We all have played Gully cricket in our childhood days, how many of us play gully hockey and I dont think that increasing the budget of the IHF would even slightly alter the scenario. Every nation has a sport that runs in the veins of its people like Brazil has soccer, canada ice hockey, US Baseball, similarly we have cricket. In case there is a cricket match we see an over whelming crowd who is desperate to get into the stadium, Can we expect even 5% of the turnout (and thus revenues ) if there were a Hockey match being conducted. All this worship of players, high brand value, high offers are offshoots of the inherent passion of the people of india for the game, not due to a policy discrimination of the government. Would just increasing the funds and facilities available to the hockey player increase the charisma of the game. It is the likeliness of the people that gives the game its aura not the allocated funds and facilities.
What we lack is a respect and an appreciation for other sports like hockey which cant be garnered in a day or so, any sport that attracts masses is bound to get glorified and there is nothing wrong with that.
Sent to THE HINDU on 13 March 2008
What we lack is a respect and an appreciation for other sports like hockey which cant be garnered in a day or so, any sport that attracts masses is bound to get glorified and there is nothing wrong with that.
Sent to THE HINDU on 13 March 2008
Wednesday, March 12, 2008
BJP attacks CPI(M) headquarters
The attack on the CPI(M) national headquarters is one of the most shameful acts of the BJP. BJP has always spoken volumes about how it wants to bring an end to widespread terrorism and internal disturbances and accused the UPA govt of being soft on terrorism. Was this basal act of BJP of attacking the CPI(M) headquarters with a handful of RSS activists not an act of domestic disturbance. BJP criticized MNS acutely for its parochial acts of violence, was this attack any different from that ultimately who got manhandled were citizens of india (in this case they were politicians). A judicial probe into the matter is definately required since such acts should be dealt with utmost severity and the culprits be punished. The politicians should overcome their partisan vendetta and behave more maturely, they have a nation to look after.
Sent to the HINDU on 12 March 2008
Sent to the HINDU on 12 March 2008
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Plight of Mr. Kashmir
The dramatic story of Mr. Kashmir Singh exposes us to yet another harsh contemporary reality .
Mr. Singh patiently bore all that was inflicted upon him over a period of 35 years of his imprisonment without succumbing to the pressures or oozing out even the slightest amount of information about his country or accepting that he was there for espionage even when a death sentence was conferred upon him. Then what happened suddenly upon his return to his home town that he burst out in front of the media accepting that he was sent by the government of India on a spying mission? Probably the situation he faced upon returning forced him to. Many of us condemned this act of Mr. Kashmir stating that it would embarrass Mr. Burney and adversely affect the indo-pak relations. In this due course of diplomacy we are overlooking the plight of the large number of government spies and other on-mission-agents who work with utmost sincerity for the govt and then end up being disowned upon being unmasked, leaving behind their dependents, family members stalkless who then live in a murky state that whether their breadwinner is even alive or not.
The state of blindly looking at a faint ray of hope of return of their dear ones is an unimaginable state whose agony and anguish only those understand who have actually gone through it. Dont people like Mr. Kashmir expect the govt to atleast take care of their family members when they rot in a foreign jail without even knowing if they would ever be released. Is it too much to ask for ? The action was obviously a knee-jerk on part of Mr. Kashmir, but is he the only one to be blamed for it ? I guess not.
Sent to THE HINDU on Mar-11 2008
Mr. Singh patiently bore all that was inflicted upon him over a period of 35 years of his imprisonment without succumbing to the pressures or oozing out even the slightest amount of information about his country or accepting that he was there for espionage even when a death sentence was conferred upon him. Then what happened suddenly upon his return to his home town that he burst out in front of the media accepting that he was sent by the government of India on a spying mission? Probably the situation he faced upon returning forced him to. Many of us condemned this act of Mr. Kashmir stating that it would embarrass Mr. Burney and adversely affect the indo-pak relations. In this due course of diplomacy we are overlooking the plight of the large number of government spies and other on-mission-agents who work with utmost sincerity for the govt and then end up being disowned upon being unmasked, leaving behind their dependents, family members stalkless who then live in a murky state that whether their breadwinner is even alive or not.
The state of blindly looking at a faint ray of hope of return of their dear ones is an unimaginable state whose agony and anguish only those understand who have actually gone through it. Dont people like Mr. Kashmir expect the govt to atleast take care of their family members when they rot in a foreign jail without even knowing if they would ever be released. Is it too much to ask for ? The action was obviously a knee-jerk on part of Mr. Kashmir, but is he the only one to be blamed for it ? I guess not.
Sent to THE HINDU on Mar-11 2008
Saturday, March 8, 2008
Condemnable Politics
Sent to THE HINDU on march 08 2008
The divisive politics as taken up by the likes of Bal Thackrey poses a grave threat to the integrity of the country whose very foundation lies on the manner in which the diversities of its culture are intertwined into one united nation. The baneful tactic was first used by Bal Thackrey in the 60s which led to the formation of Shiv Sena, at that time it was launched against the people of South India and as we ourselves can see, it turned out to be a great success. The same time-tested formula is being used again but with a slight modification of targeting the North-Indians. An important point to note is that it is us the "united non parochial citizens" - as we again and again like to call ourselves, that led to the success of this condemnable methodology in the past. As long as we the citizens get disillusioned by such petty politics and vote them to power such shameful events will occur. Isn't it sad that in a city like mumbai where people are considered to be an educated and sensible lot fall for such hollow claims of local patriotism. The perpetrators of these events should be punished but side by side the citizens should prove to such chauvinist organizations that they can not be fooled by such acts of narrow mindedness.
The divisive politics as taken up by the likes of Bal Thackrey poses a grave threat to the integrity of the country whose very foundation lies on the manner in which the diversities of its culture are intertwined into one united nation. The baneful tactic was first used by Bal Thackrey in the 60s which led to the formation of Shiv Sena, at that time it was launched against the people of South India and as we ourselves can see, it turned out to be a great success. The same time-tested formula is being used again but with a slight modification of targeting the North-Indians. An important point to note is that it is us the "united non parochial citizens" - as we again and again like to call ourselves, that led to the success of this condemnable methodology in the past. As long as we the citizens get disillusioned by such petty politics and vote them to power such shameful events will occur. Isn't it sad that in a city like mumbai where people are considered to be an educated and sensible lot fall for such hollow claims of local patriotism. The perpetrators of these events should be punished but side by side the citizens should prove to such chauvinist organizations that they can not be fooled by such acts of narrow mindedness.
Myopic Loan Waiver of Budget 2008
Sent to THE HINDU on March 5 2008
"Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime".If Mr. P. Chidambram would have realized this then farmer relief would have been given more ingeniously with a long-term vision of providing adequate means of livelihood to the aggrieved farmers all over the country. The loan waiver would certainly provide some temporary relief to the farmers but it mainly fails on the following aspects.
1) No future security to the farmers.
2) No relief to farmers in the clutches of the private high-interest money lenders.
3) Liquidity burden on the banks.
4) Injustice to the farmers who have already paid their debts ( which may in future boost dishonest practices to claim loan waivers ).
And the gravest of all is the dividing of farmers into small and marginal farmers and other farmers based on the land-holding size.
Isnt it a serious error, whether the farmer holds one hectare of land or 20 hectare of land wont a drought affect both in the similar manner. Infact the farmers with large holdings of land are more likely to be at a greater loss and in a greater debt.
And for all these objections hollow and unconvincing explanations have been cited like
" We can't do anything about private money lenders, we are doing what ever we can. "
"I [Mr. P Chidambram] will make sure that the bank has liquidity, I will work out a plan for it"
"I believe the farmer is a honest man"
These look more like escapes than genuine measures. If a little more effort would have been poured in and some amount of vision had been amalgamated into the policy a number of other good options would have surfaced, in my opinion a better alternative to the existing one time waver would have been as follows.
1) Around 80% waiver to the institutional loans of all farmers.
2) An interest holiday on the remaining 20% loan for a period of 5 years to keep the
farmers liable and avoid ingenuine cases.
3) Availability of cheap credit to farmers indebted to private money lenders upon proper
inquiry.
4) Distribution pf poultry, Dairy, fisheries and other farm fowl for farmers to have alternate means of livelihood.
5) Formation of a vigilance committee to ensure a check on the unreasonable interest rates of private money lenders.
The loan waiver is a noble first step in the pursuit of a massive goal. This is just the beginning we need to make the farmers self-dependent and ready to face the challenges of life instead of resorting to suicides.
"Give a man a fish, you feed him for a day, Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime".If Mr. P. Chidambram would have realized this then farmer relief would have been given more ingeniously with a long-term vision of providing adequate means of livelihood to the aggrieved farmers all over the country. The loan waiver would certainly provide some temporary relief to the farmers but it mainly fails on the following aspects.
1) No future security to the farmers.
2) No relief to farmers in the clutches of the private high-interest money lenders.
3) Liquidity burden on the banks.
4) Injustice to the farmers who have already paid their debts ( which may in future boost dishonest practices to claim loan waivers ).
And the gravest of all is the dividing of farmers into small and marginal farmers and other farmers based on the land-holding size.
Isnt it a serious error, whether the farmer holds one hectare of land or 20 hectare of land wont a drought affect both in the similar manner. Infact the farmers with large holdings of land are more likely to be at a greater loss and in a greater debt.
And for all these objections hollow and unconvincing explanations have been cited like
" We can't do anything about private money lenders, we are doing what ever we can. "
"I [Mr. P Chidambram] will make sure that the bank has liquidity, I will work out a plan for it"
"I believe the farmer is a honest man"
These look more like escapes than genuine measures. If a little more effort would have been poured in and some amount of vision had been amalgamated into the policy a number of other good options would have surfaced, in my opinion a better alternative to the existing one time waver would have been as follows.
1) Around 80% waiver to the institutional loans of all farmers.
2) An interest holiday on the remaining 20% loan for a period of 5 years to keep the
farmers liable and avoid ingenuine cases.
3) Availability of cheap credit to farmers indebted to private money lenders upon proper
inquiry.
4) Distribution pf poultry, Dairy, fisheries and other farm fowl for farmers to have alternate means of livelihood.
5) Formation of a vigilance committee to ensure a check on the unreasonable interest rates of private money lenders.
The loan waiver is a noble first step in the pursuit of a massive goal. This is just the beginning we need to make the farmers self-dependent and ready to face the challenges of life instead of resorting to suicides.
Culture of Intolerance
Sent to THE HINDU on March 1 2008
A lot of Protest was made and law and order disturbed in response to some historical inconsistencies in the film "Jodha Akbar" released this month. The ban has been lifted which is certainly an appropriate decision. The methods used by the people to put forward their concerns and rage over the issue were indeed wrong but was the agitation totally baseless ? The protests were criticized holistically by the various readers citing reason that the Director Ashutosh Govatrikar never claimed the movie to be a "historical account" and that no fingers were raised on the very same issue when "Mughal-e-Azam" was released in the 60's which depicts the increasing intolerance among the people. Both the statements appear to be very convincing and leave a sense of sympathy for the director and repulsion towards the agitators, but before we pass our verdict we need to really consider the other viewpoint of the matter.
The first point of the "movie not being a historical account" is invalid in its very first place. If there was to be no resemblance tothe real history and consistency with the life of Akbar and Jodha Bai why was it named after them in the first place instead of using fictious names, does'nt naming the movie after the legendary mughal ruler and the Rajput princess by itself attaches the strings of peoples reverence and emotions and coerce them expect some "historical integrity " from the movie. The magnitude of the anomalies in Jodha-Akbar may be too small to arise the issue of "historical mutilation" but the justifications given can be produced in more severe cases.
Just to cite as an example if there were a movie being made about the early 19th century and the director would potray "The Hindu" as a communal instrument in the movie which of course is totally incorrect, wouldn't each and every individual associated with "The Hindu" (including the readers and the staff) be offended. Would they care about freedom of expression or the declaration of the director as it not being a "historical account".
Further the time from the 60's has changed the population has increased over four-fold, the affordability of movie shows has increased we have people from all age groups visiting cinemas nower days. Do we consider the impact of the movie on a small child who goes to the movie show for the first time and gets introduced to "Badhshah Akbar" and the "Rajput Kings" there wouldn't it leave an indelible imprint on the perception of the tender minded child.Just to cite as an example Isnt the strength of Mighty Rajputs undermined in the film which is bound to give him a wrong impression. We speak volumes of our glorious past, and here we deliberately harming it.
Consider the two movies show the one in the 60's and the one recently, the first one shows "Akbar" opposing the love of Salim and shows him as a stern ruler opposed to the notion of love and romance in contrast with the the recent movie which shows him patronizes the love of Jodha Bai and depict him as a romantic and loving personality.
A last point to mention is that just to create dramatism in the movie and increase viewership a little amount of melodrama is pumped into every movie , strongly demarkating a Hero from a Villian. Hollywood does present some examples that do not resort to melodrama but still maintain the grandeur, consider Troy a movie that shows the clash between the two main leaders Hector ( Prince of Troy ) and Achilles ( Warrior from Greece ) both are judiciously portrayed with their own short comings and Strengths. A justice is done to both the characters Why can Hollywood maintain such subtle intricasies while we have to resort to presenting a Good guy and a Bad guy in the movie.
The anomalies of Jodha-Akbar were indeed petty and were not worth stoning theaters and causing a public havoc but the reasons given to justify even the little discrepancies were inappropriate. Movie directors and other in the business should recognize their responsibility and act in a more conscious way.
A lot of Protest was made and law and order disturbed in response to some historical inconsistencies in the film "Jodha Akbar" released this month. The ban has been lifted which is certainly an appropriate decision. The methods used by the people to put forward their concerns and rage over the issue were indeed wrong but was the agitation totally baseless ? The protests were criticized holistically by the various readers citing reason that the Director Ashutosh Govatrikar never claimed the movie to be a "historical account" and that no fingers were raised on the very same issue when "Mughal-e-Azam" was released in the 60's which depicts the increasing intolerance among the people. Both the statements appear to be very convincing and leave a sense of sympathy for the director and repulsion towards the agitators, but before we pass our verdict we need to really consider the other viewpoint of the matter.
The first point of the "movie not being a historical account" is invalid in its very first place. If there was to be no resemblance tothe real history and consistency with the life of Akbar and Jodha Bai why was it named after them in the first place instead of using fictious names, does'nt naming the movie after the legendary mughal ruler and the Rajput princess by itself attaches the strings of peoples reverence and emotions and coerce them expect some "historical integrity " from the movie. The magnitude of the anomalies in Jodha-Akbar may be too small to arise the issue of "historical mutilation" but the justifications given can be produced in more severe cases.
Just to cite as an example if there were a movie being made about the early 19th century and the director would potray "The Hindu" as a communal instrument in the movie which of course is totally incorrect, wouldn't each and every individual associated with "The Hindu" (including the readers and the staff) be offended. Would they care about freedom of expression or the declaration of the director as it not being a "historical account".
Further the time from the 60's has changed the population has increased over four-fold, the affordability of movie shows has increased we have people from all age groups visiting cinemas nower days. Do we consider the impact of the movie on a small child who goes to the movie show for the first time and gets introduced to "Badhshah Akbar" and the "Rajput Kings" there wouldn't it leave an indelible imprint on the perception of the tender minded child.Just to cite as an example Isnt the strength of Mighty Rajputs undermined in the film which is bound to give him a wrong impression. We speak volumes of our glorious past, and here we deliberately harming it.
Consider the two movies show the one in the 60's and the one recently, the first one shows "Akbar" opposing the love of Salim and shows him as a stern ruler opposed to the notion of love and romance in contrast with the the recent movie which shows him patronizes the love of Jodha Bai and depict him as a romantic and loving personality.
A last point to mention is that just to create dramatism in the movie and increase viewership a little amount of melodrama is pumped into every movie , strongly demarkating a Hero from a Villian. Hollywood does present some examples that do not resort to melodrama but still maintain the grandeur, consider Troy a movie that shows the clash between the two main leaders Hector ( Prince of Troy ) and Achilles ( Warrior from Greece ) both are judiciously portrayed with their own short comings and Strengths. A justice is done to both the characters Why can Hollywood maintain such subtle intricasies while we have to resort to presenting a Good guy and a Bad guy in the movie.
The anomalies of Jodha-Akbar were indeed petty and were not worth stoning theaters and causing a public havoc but the reasons given to justify even the little discrepancies were inappropriate. Movie directors and other in the business should recognize their responsibility and act in a more conscious way.
Pakistan Politics
Sent to THE HINDU ( letters to the editor on Feb 28 2008 )
A series of blast, a number of civilian casualties ( with Gen.(Retd.) Musharraf trying heart and soul to ensure law and order in the country) , the election day arrives, voting occurs peacefully, extremist parties that were supposedly responsible for the earlier mishaps loose and stay completely calm and composed with no post election violence. Doest all of this look really artificial, the law-enforcing authorities did not get any Alladins lamp on the polling day that would so drastically change the atmosphere, could this be a calculated move by the president to restore his credibility as a peace-guardian by allowing the non-extremist parties to come to power and later try to discredit them with planned acts of violence.Only time can tell. The PPP and PML(N) have achieved a majestic victory, they need to consolidate on a plan to capitalize on this golden opportunity and take Pakistan to new pinnacles of development and simultaneously be on guard from the not so friendly extremist forces in Pakistan.
A series of blast, a number of civilian casualties ( with Gen.(Retd.) Musharraf trying heart and soul to ensure law and order in the country) , the election day arrives, voting occurs peacefully, extremist parties that were supposedly responsible for the earlier mishaps loose and stay completely calm and composed with no post election violence. Doest all of this look really artificial, the law-enforcing authorities did not get any Alladins lamp on the polling day that would so drastically change the atmosphere, could this be a calculated move by the president to restore his credibility as a peace-guardian by allowing the non-extremist parties to come to power and later try to discredit them with planned acts of violence.Only time can tell. The PPP and PML(N) have achieved a majestic victory, they need to consolidate on a plan to capitalize on this golden opportunity and take Pakistan to new pinnacles of development and simultaneously be on guard from the not so friendly extremist forces in Pakistan.
Players Auction at IPL
Sent to the HINDU ( Letters to the Editor ) on Feb 23 2008
The recent bidding for the players for IPL was termed as ostentatious and not in the spirit of the game, fingers were raised saying that huge sums of money could have been used for other more socially beneficial causes. Well I feel that such an argument can be given to any entrepreneurial act which is done with commercial purpose. The revenues and the forex that will be generated, as is happening in Soccer leagues and Basket Ball Leagues in western and European countries is being overlooked. The revenue will definitely boost the indian economy in a big way and the funds generated can be used for escalating the plight of other sports like hockey, badminton if not for direct sociological causes.Side by side It is undeniable that a good structuring of the matches are needed to prevent the burnout of the players, thereby harming the traditional styles of the game with which people identify themselves emotionally.
Another point that is not very appreciable is the naming of the clubs ( or the franchisees ) on regions like mohali, Bombay which certainly can bring a regional dimension to the clubs, other names based on probably companies or cricketing legends would have been more in the spirit of the game.
The recent bidding for the players for IPL was termed as ostentatious and not in the spirit of the game, fingers were raised saying that huge sums of money could have been used for other more socially beneficial causes. Well I feel that such an argument can be given to any entrepreneurial act which is done with commercial purpose. The revenues and the forex that will be generated, as is happening in Soccer leagues and Basket Ball Leagues in western and European countries is being overlooked. The revenue will definitely boost the indian economy in a big way and the funds generated can be used for escalating the plight of other sports like hockey, badminton if not for direct sociological causes.Side by side It is undeniable that a good structuring of the matches are needed to prevent the burnout of the players, thereby harming the traditional styles of the game with which people identify themselves emotionally.
Another point that is not very appreciable is the naming of the clubs ( or the franchisees ) on regions like mohali, Bombay which certainly can bring a regional dimension to the clubs, other names based on probably companies or cricketing legends would have been more in the spirit of the game.
Kidney Kingpins arrest
Sent to The Hindu ( Letters to the editor) on Feb-13 2008
The nabbing of the kingpin of the inhumane kidney racket is a huge success indeed. The case should be dealt with utmost severity to set an example to the others involved in similar practices. The role of the Indian Police and the cooperation of their Nepali counterparts is commendable. The determination that is seen to unravel the alleged involvements of politicians and other offices is what is required however one fact that came to light earlier and has somehow been lost among the current issues is of Amit Kumar being arrested earlier and then bribing his was into his satanic profession. In my opinion the police authorities involved in the bribing and the politicians who endorsed the racket, without which the atrocities committed on innocent people would not have been possible. If we need a clean society we need to uproot them mere pruning of the offshoots wont be of any help.
The nabbing of the kingpin of the inhumane kidney racket is a huge success indeed. The case should be dealt with utmost severity to set an example to the others involved in similar practices. The role of the Indian Police and the cooperation of their Nepali counterparts is commendable. The determination that is seen to unravel the alleged involvements of politicians and other offices is what is required however one fact that came to light earlier and has somehow been lost among the current issues is of Amit Kumar being arrested earlier and then bribing his was into his satanic profession. In my opinion the police authorities involved in the bribing and the politicians who endorsed the racket, without which the atrocities committed on innocent people would not have been possible. If we need a clean society we need to uproot them mere pruning of the offshoots wont be of any help.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)